For centuries some females have been fooling their husbands: they marry one hardworking person, and bare a child of another. Of course the husband thinks it is his offspring and works his butt off for his alleged children. But the woman had been mating underhand with a superhuman. This UberMensch within the same tribe, did not want to marry her, because he could have his pick of women. Though, if a women offers herself to him he is not shy. This kind of behaviour is also seen among female baboons. Other animals can even save sperm of several males in their womb. Nowadays, if a male has his doubt, he can let the DNA of his children be checked in a medical laboratory. So this stealth tactic of women is cut off. But how do women react these days? By not marrying an ugly man anymore, or not having children at all.
From the Seventies onwards a subclass of women arouse who shouted the loudest that a man should not be dominant. Later I saw how these loudmouths married a super-dominant male. Only then I realised that all they wanted was to verbally castrate men by means of intellectual or ideological arguments and attacting them on their personality features; until, of course, they found a male humanimal that had a stronger mind than themselves, with whom they felt safe. So with their mouth they profess a different belief than with their cunt! Especially those who say that the man's character is more important than his looks, yet marry a typical male with a strong, tall body, outstanding jaws, narrow butt and broad shoulders.
Doing this, young women use emancipation in a hypocritical way:
Now in the Nineties we have the Career Vamps and the SuperBitches: the sexy dressed, successful, egocentric loudmouths. The nineties is the era of women, because more and more verbal affluence is important. And genetically speaking, in general women have a verbal advantage over men. This was concluded through research done by Dr. Jenny Harasty at the University of Sidney in Australia. She found the following interesting neuro-anatomical facts when comparing the brains of males with females: The the sensoric speech-centre in women is generally 30% larger than in men. And the motoric speech-centre (of Broca) is proportionally 20% larger in women. This is an evolutionary mechanism: a genetic heritage from the past is that men are physically stronger than women. So women developed two mechanisms to overcome their physical weakness: love / attractiveness and verbal intelligence. By means of verbal communication (that is: a sharp tong) they could control males like a jockey tames a horse; or beauty controls the beast. Now that physical strength is not so important any more in companies, verbal strength is the attribute to get to the top. So women will get their way and make a career finally.
Some females idolise homosexual men, because of their non-threatening posture towards women and alleged romantic feelings. But, what they deny to see is certain aspects of the gay scenes: certain homo's have sexual habits that these women would absolutely not tolerate from heterosexual men! For some homosexuals it is a sport to find different sexpartner every week, to get laid or fuck around. But if a hetero-male would even glance at another women he is scowled at and would loose sympathy.
The lesbian-feministic women movement victimise some women for life with their self-help groups. Sexually frustrated women lead an active social life within the cocoon of these talk-groups. Here they may reside for the rest of their life, hiding away of the big bad men's world.
In order to create sexual incompatibility between male and
female, you could use this Dutch Impairment Strategy. First I
will describe the natural way of courtship for the evolutional
mainstream of mammals: among a lot of animals and also the human
animal, the following is a normal behavioural strategy. I even
suspect it has genetic embedded roots in the thought-generation
mechanisms of our brain. Normally, males are the 'hunters' that
go after a female. The males take the initiative. Females await
the males' trials and accept or reject or bluntly deny a suitor.
Some females, though, signal at a distance that they may be
interested.
Nowadays since the homosexual revolution in the seventies and the
lesbian feministic revolution of
the eighties, heterosexuals are confused: in Holland males
are fooled to believe that they should not be pushy. Females are
tricked into believing that they should be dominant and take the
initiative to make contact. In those days you didn't know what to
expect, neither as man nor as woman; you didn't know what was the
correct way to go about when trying to make contact: "Should
I be super-modern and do things the other way round? Or should I
be traditionally with the risk of being regarded as a boring, old
fashion person?" This frequently led to non-contact because
both parties waited for the other do make the first move! It was
another form of Mating Signal
Obfuscation. Isn't that a neat Double Bind as a Mental Virus.
This impairment in courting behaviour between male and female, hinders the chance to reproduce. Therefore it may decrease human overpopulation, if implemented on society. So, if you love nature, then amplify the Battle of the Sexes. Reconstruct the aggressive atmosphere of the Seventies and Eighties, especially in the Third World countries. The less people reproduce, the more place there will be on this planet for nature to survive!
Go to Battle of the Sexes 2